Days of the week and other 1st world problems.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Zombie_X on August 5, 2011 at 3:45pm

Damn I wish England was a little further North XD

Permalink Reply by Enlightened Zombie on August 5, 2011 at 4:06pm

You and Kitty will be on our Int'l flight to B.C.

Permalink Reply by Koma White on August 6, 2011 at 1:38am

Permalink Reply by Enlightened Zombie on August 11, 2011 at 7:31pm

lol. it's right.

Permalink Reply by Stalker Taint on August 6, 2011 at 2:23am

Real world problems... Huh... I mean, I though people got raped in first world countries but your logic says it doesn't... I really though young girls were kidnapped and tortured brutally while being mentally destroyed and ruined for the future to come... Also, people of the USSR also used petrol, and quite often, as well as China itself. Hell, it runs off of fossil fuels to keep itself going and making money. Really, I'm fine with capitalists, though I won't deny if I could create my own government it wouldn't be run under the guise of Capitalism. More like a mix of Fascism and Communism. Not so much of the eugenic side so much as believing that I should keep the moral up in my country and preform war on a very well made basis for very impressive strategic control over territories, similar to the way America claims its territories. I also agree with the Marxist idea of working towards the common goal of the people and the country, each person holding their own, though I also believe a strong, controlling authoritarian and totalitarian based government would also benefit to the people as a kind of 'Father Knows Best' kind of thing.

Permalink Reply by Enlightened Zombie on August 11, 2011 at 7:33pm

That was long and semi-enlightening. Hybrid governments and political parties are definitely the way to go.

And the 2nd world often comes to take the women of the 1st world for the sex trade.

It's terrible and something I really considering joining a special sex-trade division to fight against.

But yeah. It fucking sucks. Death to the sex trade assholes a.s.a.p.

Permalink Reply by Zombie_X on August 11, 2011 at 10:55pm

The problem is too many people care about themselves. You see these rich people, like Bill Gates, who roll around in money, and you see Africa with all its third world countries getting ripped off by the richer. We need to stop war and all help each other.

Permalink Reply by Stalker Taint on August 23, 2011 at 8:46am

Correction. Bill Gates, and handfuls of billionaires or millionaires actually donate chunks of their money on a daily basis. Eminem promotes education in Detriot, Bill Gates and his wife donate to any organization that requires free charity, Oprah promotes education in Africa and America, though most of her funding goes to Africa. To be honest, they're doing the best they can without ending up back as smucks in the middle class. They only get so much money, and they have their own things to take care of. True, they have more money to spend on those things, but when it's running your life, trying to give your family the life you never had and finally being able to do things you were unable to, that just beats it all.

Permalink Reply by Zombie_X on August 23, 2011 at 10:04am

Once again, Taint manages to suppress yet another argument XD They are a few examples of rich, there are many more that look down at the lower class, even some that despise them. If more people helped each other, then maybe everyone would live better, even the 1st world countries. Our morals are all wrong.

Permalink Reply by Enlightened Zombie on September 19, 2011 at 4:24pm

That's why we have to add zombies. 

To correct the morals.

Permalink Reply by Stalker Taint on November 1, 2011 at 9:29pm

Does it really? Morality is based on fear of judgement. Either from peers, a higher power in religion or a higher power in some kind of law or order. Morality on a basis of survival wouldn't be to take what you need and leave the rest for others. It would become more to feast on lust, desire, wants and needs and everything in between if it could be fit. A man who finds peace would take the opportunity to feed himself on his wants and desires of a woman if the chance rose up and things would remain safe. And even then, if it wasn't safe there are men who still would, or just gag them and force the girl to keep going to a safer place so he could finish. Stealing from someone less fortunate because you have a gun? Once more zombies would only increase this. Many would find that they could survive better alone and wait for the world to get better that way if they can hole up long enough. May not be right, but to them it would seem that way. So what if you kill someone to take their things? There should be other survivors, right? Strip them of what they have, then use their meat to either eat, feed to animals around you, or test it as bait. You correct no morals. You just turn them to make things worse, and for people to die. The so called lower class of America would be some of the first to go. The upper class, who have thick walls and a steel gate with rent-a-cops would have a good chance since those gates could hold. Their neighborhoods with cops patrolling through them? Every couple of houses having guns? Ammunition? Just because they can? The lower class will be impoverished and some will not have protection, and those that could have had it would have sold it to help themselves survive with the little money they had. To correct morals you must either destroy the levels of high and lower classes, and even the middle class. Equality, and strict control over those below you, then grind them until they have no way out but to work for the community or the country or even the continent. To create a perfect world is to destroy what many of us would call enjoyment, even if it means destroying the suffering that others feel. Morality has no meaning, EZ. It all just depends on how you feel of things and weighing the consequences to see which benefits you more.